Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 11:10

Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Report: Packers taking full dead cap hit of $17 million on Jaire Alexander in 2025 - NBC Sports
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Reds To Promote Chase Burns For MLB Debut - MLB Trade Rumors
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Six killed by Israeli gunfire near Gaza aid site, Hamas officials say - BBC
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Which sunscreen cream is best for oily skin?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s a historical event you wish more people talked about?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Dozens of Israeli children develop malignant tumors from sperm donor - The Jerusalem Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
‘Stronger’ and ‘On Muscle’: What Goes to Work When We Work Out - WSJ